MODIS Land Team text, links to MODIS Land home page
MODIS Land Validation home page banner image

 

MODLAND Validation Background

The information below provides an overview of the validation strategy being implemented by the MODLAND team.


Overall Approach

MODLAND product quality is ensured by Calibration, Quality Assurance (QA) and Validation.

MODLAND uses several validation techniques to develop uncertainty information on its products. These include comparisons with in situ data collected over a distributed \set of validation test sites, comparisons with data and products from other airborne and spaceborne sensors (e.g., SeaWiFS, AVHRR, MISR, TM/ETM+, ASTER), inter-comparison of trends derived from independently obtained reference data and MODLAND products, and analysis of process model results which are driven or constrained by MODLAND products. Additional land validation activities can be found on the CEOS WGCV Land Product Validation web site (lpvs.gsfc.nasa.gov).

MODLAND's primary validation technique includes the collection of and comparison with field and aircraft data, and comparison with data and products from other satellites. The infrastructure for these efforts has resulted in the establishment of a semi-permanent set of EOS Land Validation Core Sites, most of which include a flux tower, for extended temporal measurement of terrestrial biophysical dynamics over a range of landcover types. Field data are archived in cooperation with the Oak Ridge DAAC's Mercury system. Results of all validation activities are conveyed to the end-user through both published literature and "Product Specific Validation information" posted on the MODIS LAND (MODLAND) validation web page under the Val Status button.


Validation Hierarchy

  • Stage 1 Validation: Product accuracy has been estimated using a small number of independent measurements obtained from selected locations and time periods and ground-truth/field program efforts.
  • Stage 2 Validation: Product accuracy is estimated over a significant set of locations and time periods by comparison with reference in situ or other suitable reference data. Spatial and temporal consistency of the product and with similar products has been evaluated over globally representative locations and time periods. Results are published in the peer-reviewed literature.
  • Stage 3 Validation: Uncertainties in the product and its associated structure are well quantified from comparison with reference in situ or other suitable reference data. Uncertainties are characterized in a statistically robust way over multiple locations and time periods representing global conditions. Spatial and temporal consistency of the product and with similar products has been evaluated over globally representative locations and periods. Results are published in the peer-reviewed literature.
  • Stage 4 Validation: Validation results for stage 3 are systematically updated when new product versions are released and as the time-series expands


Measures of Success

Successful validation is accomplished if timely and accurate product uncertainty information becomes routinely available to the product users.  Product-specific Validation information is now posted on the MODLAND validation web pages via the button.  As improvements and modifications to MODIS algorithms develop, this validation information will be updated - with the goal of providing accuracy statements for the most current version of each MODLAND product. 


Terra and Aqua Validation Plans 

Validation Update for Terra and Aqua , released December, 2000

The original MODLAND Validation Plan (September 1998) describes:

  • coordination with EOS Validation Investigators
  • validation sites
  • pre-launch activities
  • post-launch activities
  • implementation of validation results


Additional MODIS Validation References

Global validation of EOS land products, lessons learned and future challenges: A MODIS case study, J. Nightingale, Nickeson, J.E., Justice, C.O., Baret, F., Garrigues, S., Wolfe, R., Masuoka, E., 2008, 33rd Proc. of the International Symposium on Remote Sensing of Environment, Stresa, Italy.

Coordinating Earth Observing System Validation, J.E. Nickeson, Morisette, J.T., Privette, J.L., Justice, C.O., Wickland, D.E., 2007, Eos Trans. AGU, 88(7).

A framework for the validation of MODIS land products, Morisette, J.T., J.L. Privette, and C.O. Justice, , Remote Sensing of Environment, 83(1-2), 77-96, 2002.

Best Practices for Preparing Ecological and Ground-Based Data Sets to Share and Archive, ORNL DAAC, published in October, 2000.

"EOS Land Validation Coordination: An Update", 1998, by Chris Justice, Dave Starr, Diane Wickland, Jeff Privette, and Tim Suttles.

"EOS Global Land Validation Network" , Jeffrey L. Privette, Jeffrey T. Morisette, Chris Justice, and David Starr, IGARSS'99 Proceedings.


FirstGov logo + NASA Privacy, Security, Notices NASA logo

Curator: Jaime Nickeson
NASA Official: Jeff Morisette
Last Updated: May 5, 2010